The latest decision from the Supreme Court Zambia on the claim made by the Ventriglias reveals a lot. It shows that unethical entities like the Ventriglias can go to any extent to fulfil their personal gains and wishes. It also shows that there is a need for more courts and legal systems such as the higher Court of Appeal as well as judges who stick to transparent, ethical and honest decisions and nothing else.
The case pf Zambezi Portland Cement goes far bac. After Finsbury Investments was made the dominant part investor and legitimate proprietor of the Portland Cement Zambia production line, Ventriglias chose to assume control over the processing plant. For this, the shareholding register and different instruments marked and used for affecting changes inside PACRA framework was contested. This PACRA framework was steady with investors' arrangement and in spite of this, the Ventriglias had the option to contest them with their mafia-way of life and political interfering. This endeavor by the Ventriglias to deny the proprietor of the Portland Cement dominant part stake is an away from of bad-to-the-bone crimes inside the Zambian corporate. Because of these moves, the Ventriglias had the option to slow down the procedures at Lusaka High Court for over 10 years and convince justice Nkonde from the Lusaka High Court to report Ventriglias as the main investors of the Portland Cement Zambia.
However, after higher Court of Appeal revesed this decision from the Lusaka High Court, the Ventriglias appealed to the Supreme Court challenging the decision. However, this appeal has since been rejected by the Supreme Court as it does not fulfill any criteria for acceptance.
No comments:
Post a Comment